Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Feeling Bad for Marve

We've already documented the apparent curse against the ACLs of Purdue players.  That's a lot of tears to key players in just five years, and it's a little gut wrenching every time it happens.  For guys like Robert Marve (and previously Robbie Hummel), it saddens us even more, since it ruins not only the chance for a special season but also the potential careers of team leaders.

Marve has matured both on and off the field, and this latest news just plain sucks.  That's all I can say. We stand by Marve and are rooting for him no matter what, in everything he now does.  He's made us proud and glad he's a Boilermaker.

I try to look at the positives in a situation, and in this case there's only one - the quarterback controversy is likely over.  In my mind, that's only a positive to the coaching staff that was having trouble making a decision.   To all Purdue faithful, we'll miss seeing Marve on the field in the coming weeks.  Maybe something miraculous happens and he sees some action in the conference season.  I doubt it, but I'm rooting for it.

But we move on and continue to rally hard behind our Boilers.  Caleb TerBush is the man, and we don't doubt that he can still lead us to a special season.  Let's win for Rob.  I feel like I've had to say that a lot over the last few years, and it's always because of an ACL.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Big Ten Football Power Rankings - Week 2

Wow, the Big Ten sure looked bad this week.  Half the teams lost in non-conference play, mostly on the road, and my prediction that the conference would have a "thick, mediocre middle of the pack" looks to be coming true.  I guess the consolation there is that, even with a hard-fought loss, Purdue has shown it may have the mettle to compete for a division title this year.  But enough about the Boilers, on to the Power Rankings.  Remember, we don't give credit to preseason polls and historical prestige; we're evaluating based on what we've seen in two games so far.  We think that our process is far more judicious (and I'm sure all those people ranking teams like Wisconsin so highly last week wish they were as objective as us!).

1.   Michigan State (2-0) [Last week's rank: 1]: The Spartans easily retain the top spot after throttling Central Michigan on the road this weekend.  The defense didn't give up any points, and MSU looks very well balanced.  In honor of maintaining their place atop the Power Rankings, enjoy the most hardcore MSU fan in the country.


2.   Ohio State (2-0) [3]: Braxton Miller continued to be a one-man wrecking crew, running for almost as many yards (141) as he threw (155) as Ohio State beat Central Florida.  With the Buckeyes down to their third-string running back, a poor game by Miller (or even a mild injury making him less mobile) would be catastrophic.  But if he stays healthy, OSU should drive defenses mad.  They'll play Cal next week, and I expect them to win that one easily, too.


3.   Northwestern (2-0) [7]: Huge jump up the polls this week for the Wildcats!  Why?  Because they're undefeated and beat Vanderbilt in a close game this weekend.  Sure, Vandy is the punching bag of the SEC, but now they have a road win against the Big East and a home win against the SEC.  Not too shabby, and kudos for playing a tougher schedule.  I mentioned the quarterback controversy last week, and both Siemian and Colter both played decently.  Colter had some nice runs, but back Venric Mark had a great game with 123 yards.  The biggest plus for Northwestern was having no turnovers while forcing two key fumbles.

4.   Nebraska (1-1) [2]:  The Cornhuskers narrowly lost a tough game on the road against a ranked team that they could have beaten.  Sound like anyone you know, Boiler faithful?  Martinez had a horrible game passing, but he and Abdullah were solid in the running game.  The defense was abysmal and gave up over 650 years to the Bruins.  Tough non-conference loss, but expect Nebraska to be solid still during conference play.

5.   Purdue (1-1) [5]: Purdue played the toughest road opponent of all conference games this week and nearly got a huge win, but still looked very respectable in the loss.  The defense continues to impress, and while there were certainly missed opportunities, when the biggest flaw your team has is a debate about the starting quarterback (and both guys are fair choices), that's not a horrible situation to be in.  Of course, fixing the QB situation could be the difference from an above-average season and a special one.  Although if Marve is hurt, the situation has now fixed itself.


6.   Michigan (1-1) [4]: Michigan wins but drops in the power rankings?  Yes, because they barely beat a mediocre Air Force team at home.  Denard Robinson was the entire offense, which isn't exactly promising if you're rooting for the Wolverines to win the conference.  They need more, and they need better defense, as the stronger home team was, at times, pushed around by Air Force.  Michigan should crush UMass next week, but it will be an intriguing game when they play Notre Dame.

7.   Minnesota (2-0) [8]: Minnesota gets to move up slightly in the rankings thanks to starting out with two wins.  They easily beat FCS New Hampshire, as they should, and their passing was much more consistent.  Based solely on what we've seen on the field, maybe I should even bump them up a bit, because I'm probably holding them back because I expect Minnesota to suck.

8.   Illinois (1-1) [6]: The Illini went out west to Arizona State and got smacked around so badly that Tim Beckman now looks like Gary Busey.  I said the offense would be horrible without Scheelhaase, and it was just so-so, but I also said their defense looked great against Western Michigan, who was held to negative rushing yards.  That same defense couldn't stop the passing game and gave up 510 yards and 45 points to the Sun Devils, and it could have easily been more.  I guess Western Michigan is just that pathetic, and the Illini either don't travel well, or were just really disappointed by the lack of parties near campus.

9.   Wisconsin (1-1) [9]: You all laughed at my low rank for Wisconsin last week after they barely beat an FCS opponent, but now people are realizing what I saw.  Lots of hype, no running game (only 61 yards for Ball), and poor QB play as the Badgers fall on the road to Oregon State.  That's three Big Ten teams losing road games to the Pac-12 this weekend, and only one of the opponents was ranked.  Pitiful. Maybe Wisconsin will right the ship after firing their offensive line coach today?

10. Iowa (1-1) [10]: Playing at home against rival Iowa State, Iowa only managed six points and lost 9-6.  Their offense is impotent, and for a "veteran" quarterback, Vandenberg is the dregs, completing less than half his passes and throwing two interceptions.  Bullock couldn't even get going, only averaging a couple yards per carry.  At least the defense showed up, forcing four turnovers, but that still wasn't enough for the anemic offense.  Wow, impotent and anemic - sounds like Iowa needs a trip to the emergency room stat.

11. Indiana (2-0) [11]: Another big congratulations to the Hoosiers for beating their first non-FCS opponent in two years!  Wait, it was UMass?  They have an FBS program?  Ah, only in name, this team would be lucky to finish in the middle of the pack in a JuCo league.  So until Indiana proves they don't suck by beating someone even remotely respectable, they're still relegated to the near-bottom of the power rankings.  The real bad news for the Hoosiers was the season-ending injury to quarterback Tre Roberson.  He's a real talent, and without him, I don't expect IU to win a conference game this season...again.

12. Penn State (0-2) [12]: Another Saturday, another sad, yet justified, Penn State loss.  This time the Nittany Lions fell by one point on the road at Virginia by giving up a touchdown with less than two minutes to go.  Penn State out-rushed and out-passed the Cavaliers, drew far fewer penalties, and won the turnover battle by a margin of four!  So how did they lose?  Karma.  And "Karma" is the name of the invisible gremlin that caused kicker Sam Ficken to miss four field goals on the day.  Bet they wish he had transferred.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Purdue - Notre Dame Recap: Almost...

I watched this game in a bar and missed what was surely a very fair, non-biased announcing crew.  I'm sure you'll all agree that the officiating was of the same quality.  It may have been heartbreaking, but isn't it fun to have close games like this that actually matter?



Overview:
Purdue lost to Notre Dame 20-17 in a game that really could have gone either way.  Heading into the last possession of the game, stat lines were very similar, and overall it didn't feel like one team was dominating more than the other.  Unfortunately Tommy Rees (yes, the same Tommy Rees who has a suspended 30-day jail sentence from an incident earlier this year) came in on the last possession and led Notre Dame to a game-winning field goal. 


The Offense:
Caleb TerBush started the game and initial impressions were that he was playing well.  TerBush led the Boilers to several first downs in the first two drives but just wasn't able to come up with the big 3rd down play when needed.  The first drive went 13 plays but ultimately led to a punt. Robert Marve came in for the rest of the half and led an impressive 13 play drive that culminated in a big touchdown to tie the game at the end of the half.  The big play on the drive was a bizarre 4th & 4 play in which Marve somehow found a very covered Crosby Wright for a first down.  It appeared Marve was just trying to get Notre Dame to jump offsides - and he was actually successful - but the ball was never snapped.  With everyone thinking Purdue would take the delay of game, Marve took the snap with less than a second on the play clock and executed the classic pick-up football "everyone just run around and try to get open" play.

The big question at the end of the first half was whether to start Marve or TerBush in the second half.  While popular consensus was Marve, I actually thought going with TerBush was the right move.  Both were equally effective in the first half, neither had made a mistake, and barring a nearly miraculous 4th down conversion, TerBush actually would have had much better numbers.  However, the offense came out struggling in the second half and TerBush threw an awful interception on his second possession that led to a field goal.  Down 17-7, it was time to make a switch.  However, TerBush was granted another chance and proceeded to go three and out.

Marve was finally given the chance to lead the team again and immediately went on a scoring drive.  This SHOULD have been a touchdown, yet Marve took a very costly delay of game that most likely cost the team 4 points.  While it appeared Marve had the momentum, two 3 and outs followed before TerBush came back in to throw the game tying Touchdown pass. 

Overall, I thought the offense looked solid and did a good job eliminating turnovers.  The one interception was costly, but it really looked like the Boilers were much more focused on playing mistake-free ball than they were against Eastern Kentucky.  This offense can strike at any time and won't be playing many defenses better than Notre Dame's this year.  TerBush did throw a god-awful hail mary at the end of the game, so I definitely would suggest working on that.

The Defense:
The defense is going to keep us in a lot of games this year.  For this first time since 2004, it feels like the identity of this team is now an outstanding defense.  The line did an unbelievable job against the run while the secondary kept things manageable in front of them.  324 yards is a lot to give up through the air, but I counted one pass by Everett Golson that wasn't a catchable ball.  I thought he was very impressive for a freshman, and really seemed to be able to find his tight end, Tyler Eifert.

The forced fumble and recovery by Josh Johnson was a thing of beauty, as Johnson actually grabbed Golson's arm to keep him from recovering the ball.

Overall, I'm VERY excited to see this defense progress throughout the season, although a weakness may have been exposed with Notre Dame's success in throwing to the tight end.

Special Teams:
In the biggest turnaround from last week's game, special teams played mistake-free.  I can't think of one bad play they made.  Meanwhile Sam McCartney made his first ever field goal attempt (in a pressure-filled situation too!) and Raheem Mostert had a couple of nice kick returns.  The unit didn't do anything amazing throughout the game, but I'll take a mistake-free game like this every single week!

Coaching:
Best coaching decision:  As someone who gets very angry when timeouts are mismanaged, I was furious when Hope called a timeout on 4th and 10 with a little over 2 minutes left.  4th and 10 is tough to convert, especially when you're that close to the endzone.  The Boilers still had 2 timeouts and could get the ball back even if they didn't convert.  Instead, Hope called a time out and put all his eggs in one basket.  Sure enough, he called a great play and TerBush fired to an open Antavian Edison for the game-tying score.  It turned out to be a great time out and a great play call.  My bad.  Way to go Coach Hope!

Worst coaching decision: The coaches are getting a lot of grief after this one and rightly so.  Anytime a team loses with a questionable strategy (2 QB system), it will rile up the masses.  I already mentioned that I didn't have a problem with TerBush starting the 2nd half, but I DID have a problem with him coming out for the third possession after the break.  TerBush had made a very poor decision on the interception and Hope claimed he was in there for that very reason - to not make those mistakes.  TerBush went on to go 3 and out on the next drive. Coach, it was time for a change, but it came one possession too late.

Worst Call by a Zebra:
This could be a whole post in and of itself, but what else do you expect when heading up to South Bend?  Three plays stick out, but only one can be the worst call...

1) The touchdown/touchback replay review: Originally ruled down at the one, replays showed that Everett Golson's dive into the endzone in the first half should have either been a touchdown or a touchback.  However, it was almost impossible to tell which one was correct.  The rule in this situation?  The call on the field stands.  It would have been 4th down and Notre Dame would have most likely settled for a field goal.  Instead, the refs somehow thought the ball hit the pylon while in Golson's hands which is something I couldn't see even if I went frame by frame on my DVR.

2) The offsides call: On Purdue's first scoring drive, a Notre Dame player was running off the field, thinking he was the 12th man.  He really was the 11th, so there was no penalty for too many men on the field.  Unbelievably, though, he was a yard and a half OVER the line of scrimmage when the ball was snapped, was on the field by several steps AND did it right in front of the referee!  No flag came out which ended up putting Purdue in a dicey 3rd down later in the possession.  Purdue ended up scoring anyway, but this was just awful.  See for yourself (bottom of the screen):




3) The delay of game call:  It's 3rd down on the game-winning drive, and Notre Dame still has the ball with zero seconds on the play clock.  This is about to be the game's second most boneheaded delay of game.  Except the refs didn't call it!  Notre Dame would convert the third down and the rest is history.  Again, see it for yourself:


I know you may all disagree, but the worst call was the offsides call.  It had very little effect on the game, but it was definitely the easiest call of the three and the one that was most blatantly missed.


Most Important Play:
Josh Johnson's forced fumble and recovery was the most important play of the game for a multitude of reasons.  It not only put Purdue in position to tie the game, but it also injured Golson just enough to convince Brian Kelly to put in Tommy Rees on Notre Dame's final possession.  Regardless of what he says.

The Biggest Missed Opportunity AND "My sister could have executed that play better" Award:
Third and Goal from the one yard line.  Down 10 late in the third quarter.  You have two chances to get one yard.  So SNAP THE FREAKING BALL BEFORE THE PLAY CLOCK RUNS OUT!  All Robert Marve had to do was snap the ball and hand it off.  They most likely would've gotten a touchdown.  My sister could've executed that really important missed opportunity better.

In Conclusion:
Purdue showed a lot of heart in this game, but you can't help but lament the chances they let get away.  Notre Dame played very undisciplined and Purdue really had a chance to steal one in South Bend.  The most important thing to take away, though, is that Purdue WILL be a contender for Indianapolis.  Wisconsin got beat by a so-so Pac-12 team.  Illinois got crushed by Arizona State.  Indiana is Indiana.  Could Purdue be the new favorite to go to Indy?  Tough to take that from a loss, but unless you thought Purdue was going to the National Championship game, this loss doesn't hurt that bad.  Let's take care of business over the next 3 weeks - then the real fun starts!

Stay tuned later this week for your favorite GoBoilers.net features including the always humorous Broadcast Recap and the always 100% correct Power Rankings!

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Preview: Purdue vs. Notre Dame - September 8th - 3:30 pm

Boy do I hate Notre Dame.  I hate their sense of entitlement.  I hate their "if you're Catholic/Irish you have to root for us" arrogance.  I hate their belief that football is as important as their faith.  I love Jesus, but I hate "Touchdown Jesus." I hate that all their home games air on NBC, with announcers that are incredibly biased because they know who pays them.  Now that I think about it, I hate NBC.  I hate that I visited campus once and actually had a good time (the things one does for a U2 concert). I hate the BCS system that perpetuates giving them special treatment and undeserved opportunities.  I hate that every coaching change, since Bob Davie, is treated like a savior arriving to campus.  Who can forget George O'Leary? I hate fair-weather fans in my state, and across the nation, that couldn't name five players on the team but sport the school's apparel every fall weekend.  I hate the attention their quarterbacks receive, even though one hasn't succeeded in the NFL for almost 30 years.

I also hate that I throw around the word "hate" a little too loosely, but I really don't like that school.

Now that I got that off my chest, let's talk about the actual game this weekend.

A lot has been written about the decision to start Caleb TerBush after his suspension.  I tend to agree with J at Boiled Sports.  I expect all Boilermakers to rally behind the team, and I'm putting my trust in the coaches that know a heck of a lot more than me.  If you read my recap of the Eastern Kentucky game, you know I thought Marve deserved the start, but I want the best chance to beat Notre Dame.  I know that's what Danny Hope wants, too.  The coach has a lot riding on this decision, so I don't think he's made it lightly or without some specific game plan in mind.

Why Purdue wins
Purdue proved last week that they can dominate an inferior opponent, could run the ball well, and put up nice passing numbers with a "backup" quarterback.  It's going to take some sharp quarterback play to take advantage of the Notre Dame secondary, but the real key for the Boilers will be their ability to stop the Irish with their veteran defense.  Against Eastern Kentucky, the defense was incredibly solid, only giving up one big drive and hunkering down after repeated turnovers.  While I don't fear this Notre Dame team as much as other teams in the last decade (and think their ranking is too high for all the "hate" reasons mentioned above), it will take some excellent play on both ends and the ability to win the turnover battle to come away victorious.  I also think the coaching staff has a few tricks up their sleeve, since the offense was pretty conservative last week.  There's also the hangover factor after ND returned from Ireland this week, and maybe Purdue can start fast and catch them sleeping (like Notre Dame did to the Boilers last season). And maybe Navy is just really that bad and worse than an FCS school.

Why Notre Dame wins 
Lucky charms, of course. Notre Dame is the big favorite after mauling Navy last weekend in Ireland, and they have some potent weapons.  They spread the ball around to a lot of skilled receivers, and they almost had two 100-yard rushers last game.  Purdue didn't do a very good job stopping the Irish offense last year either.  On defense, ND boasts a stout line that could cause a lot or problems for whichever quarterback Purdue decides to put under center.  There's going to be a lot of pressure and may not be much time for the passing game to get into rhythm or for receivers to get open down the field. Also, Purdue has only won once in South Bend since 1974, so that sucks.

Player we're most concerned about since their stock photo may break our TV
I didn't find a particularly goofy head shot, but I did find some guys that were trying way too hard to look intimidating on picture day. (They also both happened to have ridiculous names)

Check out Carlo Calabrese and Prince Shembo (pictured to the right)

1. They have a dude named Chris Badger.  I'm sure you're thinking, "How did he not go to Wisconsin?"  Better question, coming out of Provo, Utah, how much does it piss BYU off that he's at Notre Dame?

2. They also have a Chris Brown.  I already like him, because he looks hilarious and hopefully doesn't beat women.

3. Best* name on the team: Starting center Braxton Cave. (*by "best" I mean most Notre Dame-douchiest)

Picks of the week
The spread obviously favors Notre Dame at home (-14.5). This week, Erik and I will be betting the value of the shoes we are currently wearing as I write this post.

Kirk's Bet
Right now it's not just football season, it's also US Open season.  For those that couldn't tell from our other posts, we're big tennis fans, and after attending the Open last week in NYC, I can't get enough.  So I'm proudly wearing my blue Adidas Rod Lavers.  They were a huge bargain on sale for $30 when I bought them about 7 years ago, but they have some wear on the white edging, so they'd probably only fetch like $10 right now (although they must be a collectors item since they don't make them in this color/style anymore).

I think Purdue is going to make this a closer game than many think, but in the end, the leprechauns win at home. Notre Dame 24 - Purdue 17

Erik's Bet
Erik doesn't get to be so casual at work, so he's sporting some black Dunham dress shoes that he purchased for $89 about 6 years ago.  He wears them nearly every day because he's too lazy to buy new shoes, so they're in pretty bad shape.  He's offering them up for $6.

Erik is just as pessimistic, as it's hard to pick Purdue as the outright winner, even though we're rooting hard for it.  He's also got the Boilers covering the spread, but based on our overly cautious picks last week, don't expect us to be that close on the point margin.  Here's hoping Purdue proves us horribly wrong again. Notre Dame 31 - Purdue 20

Three Final Things
1. ESPN just put Notre Dame on upset alert on SportsCenter, and Yahoo has done the same.

2. Remember this?  Let's see it happen again on Saturday!

3. Boiler Up!

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Big Ten Football Power Rankings - Week 1

Like every other blogger in the universe, we're going to list our Big Ten Conference power rankings each week, but ours will be based solely on what we've seen on the field.  Screw preseason polls that skew things strongly towards expectations and big names.  Win your games, look good doing it, and we'll show you some love. Therefore, expect to see some big swings each week.

Also, we're going to keep Ohio State and Penn State in our rankings respective to their play, despite the fact that they can't make the postseason.  That'll just make it far more fun to laugh at them (probably just OSU) when they see what could have been if they hadn't cheated (or done things far, far worse).

Finally, while we appreciate a TV show/movie/pop culture-themed power rankings list when it's done in a clever way, most of them suck.  So we aren't going to do that.  Instead, we'll just include an awesome* photo of each school with their ranking that showcases how fans should be feeling.  Much simpler, right?

Hit the snare drums and blast the trumpets, because it's time for GoBoilers.net's 2012 Big Ten Football Power Rankings!

Overall, it wasn't a particularly great weekend for the conference.  While most teams won the games they were supposed to (cough, Penn State, cough), many of the victories were far too close.  It looks like there is going to be a very thick mediocre middle pack of the conference; just like a Midwestern beer belly. By the time conference play gets here, I'm not sure much of that will change.


Someone's happy with #1

1.   Michigan State (1-0): The Spartans get the top spot for beating the best collective opponent in Week 1, Boise State.  Other teams may have looked better, but remember how inferior some of the competition was last weekend.  MSU didn't win big, but they won, and Bell ran for 210 yards, which is scary for fans of other conference teams.  Their quarterback play is suspect, however, as Maxwell threw three picks, so they are far from invulnerable.







2.   Nebraska (1-0): They won big, as expected, and Taylor Martinez played great. The run game was also really dominant.  Stud running back Rex Burkhead may miss some games with an injury, which could move them from a very good team to just another good team, but until we know for sure, the Cornhuskers are firmly in the discussion for top conference team. His backup had quite a nice game though, so the loss may be manageable.


3.   Ohio State (1-0): Braxton Miller ran very well and threw for two touchdowns.  Consider me glad OSU can't make the Big Ten title game this season.  Even without that motivation, they have the talent to win the division and make life uncomfortable for teams like Purdue fighting for the postseason.




Mad they lost, mad OSU is above them
4.   Michigan (0-1): It's a little painful for me to put Michigan this high on the list since they got completely owned by Alabama.  I would have put them much lower, but Erik talked some sense into me.  When I thought about how the other Big Ten schools would have fared against the annoyingly-good Tide, I think most would have left with fewer points and even more egg on their face. Robinson played poorly, and their rushing was terrible, but they were also without star running back Fitzgerald Toussaint, who will return next week.  It's almost harder to get a fair measure of how good a team is playing when they temporarily lack a significant contributor against powerhouse Alabama than when they play against a crappy FCS school.

One small step for man...
5.   Purdue (1-0): As you can read in my wrap-up, Purdue did some good things against inferior competition.  Despite the suspension of their starting quarterback (which at Purdue doesn't seem to matter thanks to the three-headed QB monster), they looked good, despite some issues with special teams and too many turnovers.  I know this looks like a huge homer pick, but it's easy to make a case that the teams listed #6-12 didn't do anything any more impressive last weekend.




6.   Illinois (1-0): I'm torn (no pun intended) on where to put Illinois, since Scheelhaase may miss some games due to injury.  With him, the Illini offense is looking pretty decent, but without him, they could be horrible.  At least the defense is stout, having held Western Michigan to negative rushing yards in the game.  Either way, the easily handled their MAC foe, unlike some teams.







Painfully irate, excited, or constipated?
7.   Northwestern (1-0): I'm actually happy to see Northwestern so high on the list, since I never really root against them other than when they play Purdue.  The Wildcats won on the road at a BCS school, which is impressive, until you realize that it was against a Big East opponent. The strangest thing was that starting quarterback Kain Colter benched himself, leaving backup Trevor Siemian to lead the team to its last-minute winning touchdown.  It looks like with either guy this team will score points, but can they stop anyone?  They let Syracuse rattle off 28 unanswered points in the second half.




8.   Minnesota (1-0): Another team that should be happy to be listed so high after some horrible recent years.  Honestly, neither the Gophers or UNLV, who they narrowly beat in triple overtime, are very good, but they got the win on the road.  Minnesota had a lot of penalties and was quite inconsistent, but they turned it on in crunch time.



Ready to kill the guy who made these rankings

9.   Wisconsin (1-0): When you barely beat an FCS school, you deserve what you get.  Wisconsin is a much better team than ninth in the conference, but they were incredibly disappointing this weekend.  Sure, they had a nice lead late in the third quarter, but they gave up some big plays, and they should have won this game in a rout.


10.  Iowa (1-0): The Hawkeyes are an enigma.  I expect them to always be in the top half of the conference, because they always seem to be, but I don't give them much thought any more (other than the fact we have to play them annually).  They should be better than a team that has to come from behind to barely beat Northern Illinois, right?  Bullock can run, but their passer sucks.  Maybe we can trade them a QB?

Pretty standard IU football fan

11.  Indiana (1-0): Congratulations to IU for clearing the cellar of the Big Ten rankings for the first time in a couple years!  Your thank-you notes should be addressed to Penn State, care of their wretched administration.  Indiana narrowly beat Indiana State, an FCS school, but they were almost outplayed and still haven't topped an FBS opponent since 2010.  Even the IU fans are questioning the team and coach already.





Just plain sad

12.  Penn State (0-1): The Nittany Lions started their new era with a thud, losing badly to Ohio.  Honestly, Ohio looked pretty good, but this is just pathetic for Penn State, albeit incredibly deserved.  I feel bad for the current players though, and I expect them to rise out of the Big Ten basement soon enough...but not too far.


What do you all think about that list?

Monday, September 3, 2012

Broadcast Recap - Eastern Kentucky Edition

Make sure to check out Kirk's great recap of Saturday's game!  Meanwhile, here are a couple of things you missed if you didn't watch Saturday's game on BTN...

Screenshot of the week:  Purdue was VERY lucky to get out of this game relatively unscathed.  Check out the lower left portion of your screen right after Eastern Kentucky scored their touchdown.  It's the JOKER!


In reality, that's tight end, Paul Henry.  And as you can see below, he's normally a regular looking dude.  However, whatever the hell he had going on with his lips on Saturday was enough to make me consider sending out the bat-signal. 


Announcer complaint: It was a Glen Mason lovefest in the booth, as every positive yardage play was "straight out of Glen Mason's playbook!"  Remembering Glen Mason from his Minnesota days, I'm just glad none of our defensive plays were straight out of Glen Mason's playbook.

Thing I learned from BTN: This was nearly a complaint until I looked it up online and found out it was true.  The pronunciation of Kawaan Short's name is now apparently KAY-won.  And credit BTN for getting it correct. Still don't believe me?  Here's the official game notes (check out page 3).  If I had to guess, Kawaan finally brought it up this year.  Last year's information guide (page 15) doesn't mention anything about his name in the same section, and I'm pretty sure NOBODY would have pronounced his name like that!

Irrelevant Comment of the Week - Wife Edition:  I made the mistake of telling my wife she could get a comment into the recap if she said something irrelevant and humorous.  So she spent the entire game coming up with one-liners that were mildly humorous, but you could tell she was trying too hard.  I've told her the feature is getting cut, so now maybe she'll go back to making actual funny irrelevant comments again.  Meanwhile, she did spend the whole game praying that some guy named Sanders played for the Colonels, and sure enough, Jared Sanders got his name called by returning 3 kickoffs. Thank you Colonel Sanders for making my wife's day.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Purdue Easily Tops Eastern Kentucky - I Learn Very Little

Get ready for a post-game recap unlike any other!  Erik already explained our plans for our football previews, but our game recaps may vary a lot this year depending on if one of us actually got to attend in person. 

Yours truly was lucky enough to "brave the weather" and head to West Lafayette for the first game of the season, with my three-year-old daughter in tow.  In that spirit, my recap will involve not only my thoughts about the game, but also my daughter's opinion of what she saw.  I think her analysis may actually be better than mine, so I'm working to get her some press credentials and an internship at the Indy Star.  They may actually have enough in their coffers to pay a toddler to be a beat reporter for the team up north that they so often overlook.

Looking back at our preview, it's clear that I was the only one thinking the weather would make this game a miserable, sloppy affair, but it turned out to just be a muggy overcast day, allowing for some actual offensive production.  The ponchos stayed in the bag, and my prediction of a relatively (for an FCS opponent) low-scoring result for the Boilermakers was very, very inaccurate.  Erik's prediction was also way off (seriously, you thought we'd win by only 1 point?), so we both owe our bookie a little money, I mean expensive New York beer.

IMG_6001
Celebrating gold medalist David Boudia on the Jumbotron
Overall, the Boilers performed better than we thought, on both sides of the ball.  That's the good news.  The bad news - I really didn't learn as much about the team as I hoped, due partly to the inferior level of the opponent.  No knock on Eastern Kentucky (and thanks for reading Colonels!), but we know they can play better, and without their starting quarterback and center, they weren't the FCS titan we stressed about.

Let's break down our analysis and cover some subject areas we hope to make a weekly theme:

Overview:
With a 48-6 win, usually I'd be pretty excited, and it was certainly a fun game to watch at times.  With a halftime score of 34-6, the second half seemed a little dull, but that can happen when it's hot and muggy, you're hungry, and you have to ask your daughter every 10 minutes if she needs to use the bathroom.

My daughter's thoughts: "Can I have some goldfish?"

The Offense:
Since projected starting quarterback Caleb Terbush was suspended (which was only announced immediately prior to the game, much to my surprise), we got to see a lot of Robert Marve.  And what we saw was pretty good.  Marve started the game with a drive into Eastern Kentucky territory before throwing a pretty horrible interception across the middle.  The groans from my section of the stadium were quite loud, but Marve redeemed himself by leading the team to four first half touchdowns.  Overall, he was 30 for 38, with 295 yards and 3 touchdowns.  Marve did have a bone-headed, "whoops, the ball slipped out of my butterfingers" fumble in the second half, but with a huge lead, I laughed as much as I cried.  It seemed like a freak occurrence more than a systemic problem.  Overall, not too shabby at all for the super-super-senior, considering he split some time with Rob Henry. 

While it was great to see Henry back on the playing field (and I don't think I could like and respect a member of the football team more than him), his results were mixed.  He also threw a terrible interception, lost a fumble (that was due more to a helmet-on-ball hit during a run, hard to fault him), but he went 7 for 9 for 77 yards, a touchdown, and gained 19 yards rushing.  Henry's first few possessions were wildcat/read-option plays, which actually worked very well, but I was glad to see him get the opportunity to pass later on in the second half (after the second quarter interception he threw). Twelve different players caught passes, so it was nice to see the blowout win used to check out some of our depth.

The passing plays were pretty conservative for both quarterbacks, with lots of screens and short routes.  The longest completion (not including yards after the catch) couldn't have been more than 12 or 15 yards. It allowed the Boilers to use their advantages in speed and size to create nice lanes to run after the reception.  The same applied to the running game.

Eight different Purdue players, not including quarterbacks, got carries, and the team rushed for 175 total yards.  Akeem Shavers got the most carries (11) including a 34-yard scamper, and he and Mostert both looked good.  Hopefully their performance wasn't just due to the quality of the opponent.  Either way, there's some nice speed and athleticism coming out of the backfield this year for Purdue.

The team nearly set a record with 33 first downs in the game, partly due to all the short yardage passes, but could have easily been more if they hadn't turned the ball over five times. An interception and a fumble by each quarterback were the bulk, along with a punt return fumble that you can read about down the page.

My daughter's thoughts: "1-2-3-4, first down, yay!"

The Defense:
I thought the defense was stout on Saturday, but the FCS caveat definitely should be recognized, especially since Eastern Kentucky was playing its second-string quarterback.  That made their pass game pretty limited, and they only made one long pass I can remember.  The Boilers forced two sacks, despite not having to add much pressure. 

I was more impressed with how the defense stopped the Colonels' running attack, since they featured Matt Denham, one of the best rushers in the FCS, who averaged 130 yards per game.  He was held to 47 yards on 12 carries, and only broke away for one long (30 yard) gain.  Let's hope the D can be that effective next week against Notre Dame.

Really, other than one bad series that gave up the lone EKU touchdown, the defense was solidly in control, even making up for the momentum shifts coming from Purdue's five turnovers.

My daughter's thoughts: "Those guys are bigger than you, daddy."

Special Teams:
Two kickoffs out of bounds, one blocked extra point, one blocked punt, one fumbled punt return.  If Purdue does this against Notre Dame, we probably lose by 30 points.  Hopefully the guys got this out of their system with first game jitters.  I don't have a lot of faith in that though, since this seems to be a constant problem.

Kudos to Kawann Short though, who blocked a field goal and extra point!  Guy's a beast!

My daughter's thoughts: "He kicked it sooo hard!"

Coaching:
Best coaching decision: The biggest thing I can applaud Coach Hope for is benching Terbush for whatever team policy he broke.  That's not always the easiest decision to make, but I hope it sets a great tone for the team this year that you do things the right way.  Benching your starting quarterback and team captain is gutsy, especially when he "really outperformed both the other quarterbacks, hands down, throughout the course of camp."  Of course, it helps when you have three quarterbacks with significant experience.  Here's hoping that Marve gets the start against Notre Dame. He deserves it, and Terbush should have to work his way back up the depth chart for being a bonehead.

Worst coaching decision: Some people are ranting about Marve playing into the fourth quarter, which doesn't bother me since he needed the practice and Henry's still getting back to full speed.  Others lament the directional kick-offs that didn't go very well with a freshman kicker, but now was the time to practice in a low-risk environment.  Because the game was so lopsided, Hope wasn't put into a situation where he needed to make a risky decision that didn't pan out (like two onside kicks in the first half, the last time we saw the team in action).

My daughter's thoughts: "Can we go meet the cheerleaders now?"

Worst Call by a Zebra:
You know it's a good game when you leave having not once thought about the officiating.  Other than kicking it out-of-bounds, the Boilers didn't have a single penalty called against them until the fourth quarter.  This is a huge improvement and hopefully a result of Hope bringing in real referees to practice.

My daughter's thoughts: "I like zebras!"

Biggest Missed Opportunity:
I'm going off the field for this one.  The biggest missed opportunity was all the empty seats at Ross-Ade.  I know it's the first game of the season, against an FCS team, and the weather was forecasting to be pretty ugly, but the game was played without a drop of rain to a stadium that was at half capacity.  I'm not trying to be self-righteous, since I don't make it to the majority of home games, but I really expected more people to show up since tickets were FREE for a lot of people.  Season ticket holders had the chance to get two free seats to the game (which I happily took advantage of), which should have filled the North end zone. Even though that promotion hurts revenue for the athletics department, at least free tickets could put butts in seats.  I wonder what it would have looked like without the freebies.

My daughter's thoughts: "He dropped the ball."

Most Important Play:
After Marve's interception on the first series, on our next possession, the veteran led us down the field for a touchdown.  That was a much needed redemption series, and fortunately it was mostly all uphill from there.  While that series was the most important in getting the tone of the game back on a positive note, the most important play immediately followed.  On the second play of EKU's possession, Landon Feichter grabbed a pick six.  With a 13 point lead, it really secured the remaining 53 minutes.

My daughter's thoughts: "Tuckdown!"

The "My sister could have executed that play better" Award:
In the second half, redshirt freshman Frankie Williams was back to return a punt.  The kick was short, and as he lunged forward to try to get to it before it bounced, he touched the ball, never gained possession, and a Colonel jumped on it for the fumble recovery in Purdue territory. I feel for the kid, who was hoping to make a play in his first chance, but he didn't make the smart decision.  Fortunately the defense stepped up in a big way and forced a fumble to keep EKU from scoring.

And my sister could have easily executed that play better - because she would have run away from the football, screaming and flailing her arms, and therefore not have fumbled the catch.  So, I'd still rather have Williams back there, most of the time - for the upside.  My sister can be the fourth option on the depth chart though.

My daughter's thoughts: "Why is everyone mad?"

In Conclusion:
Even with our flaws, a win is a win, and a huge win should always be reason for celebration. I definitely think we have a chance to upset Notre Dame next week, although only a slight chance given the whooping they put on Navy.  While the game still leaves me with a lot of the same preseason unanswered questions (How will the quarterback situation work? Can we hold onto the ball? (OK, that's a "no" right now) Will we be able to stop good opponents?), I was impressed with the majority of what I saw, and I'm excited to see what happens this year.

My daughter's thoughts: "My favorite part was the cheerleaders, daddy." Agreed.

On a more serious note, we highlighted the Colonels Kevin Hamlin in our game preview, both recognizing his skills as a formidable defender and crazy long hair.  Thanks to a commenter, we learned the hair growth is for Locks of Love to honor his mother, a breast cancer survivor.  That is awesome.  We salute you, Mr. Hamlin, and we hope you keep growing your hair out until it's long enough to jump rope.

IMG_6003